How Can One Learn What They Already Gnow?

仝
It's my intention to write about the possibility that what humans attempt to teach other humans about is exactly what they wanna know about themselves, but how can that be? How can we use the other to teach ourselves what we already know, but can't use that gnosis for-ourselves, as if profound self-understanding?

Could it be possible that what we project of ourselves upon the other is simultaneously a rejection of the claim that what we project is us instead of them. Projection/rejection?

Do these two terms represent a polarity? Is projection/rejection different ends of the sa-me spectrum. I su-spect so. I've never seen the term anti-jection used to oppose pro-jection. Besides, what does that have to do with ectoplasm? pro-ject; re-ject; spect-rum; su-spect; ecto-anything. Ecto?

From the Mac OS dictionary.app:

ecto-
combining form
outer; external; on the outside (used commonly in scientific terms) : ectoderm | ectoparasite.
ORIGIN from Greek ektos ‘outside.’

Odd. The first thing that came to mind as I wrote and cut and pasted above was the term "inject". Would inject mean to turn something external into something internal? How about interject? The "j" seems extraneous. Jecto? No, jecto seems to be a jet engine in Spanish.

Confused already? That's what I do sometime to get my current insight over the hump with some injection or glimmer of hope that evokes a new interest. Sometime I'm able to go from the ridiculous to the sublime in one fell swoop by unbecoming (un-be-co-me-ing) rituals of great antiquity.

Ben came over and interrupted my writing, but I continued the rap I never got to write down because of his demand for attention. I did take the time to show him the youtube video of the Ukrainian woman sand painting, and it affected him in just the manner I thought it would. He's already figuring how he's gonna do it himself. No blame.

I only appear to have one basic ongoing project presently. My aim is to continuously reach for my inner voice as my goto place of reference. It's a tedious quest. That world is there for me as I need it and never any other time. That dictates my behavior to some degree. If it is there for-me, then it's the cat's meow, and if it isn't there for-me I have to accept that I bought into some red herring that taking me further and further away from my home on the range.

The claim I act like is so, about blaming my daily failures on not having much of a future left, because of my age, is one of those false trails. It's like a path with no heart. Which is why the whole point of my current endeavors is to reach for what I need in the specious present from my ongoing relationship with an ancient past mostly in which there were no words.

Homo sapiens apparently don't remember the time before they began speaking. I watched it time and again doing hypnosis and helping some subject to relive their birthing experience. I used a hypnotic patter to help them regress back to being a baby again.

Part of the deal with that would be to stop at some recognizable point along the way like a birthday party and have them relive significant occasions to prepare for the end game. A lotta that has to do with helping them realize they're in a deep hypnotic state.

When I might have the subject recall various significant events like remembering the presents they received at their sixth birthday party, they automagically realize that they couldn't recall these events without being in a hypnotic trance.

They have to realize they can't enter a subjective hypnotic state and maintain a conscious presence that would ask the questions they need to answer to find out where they're at with how real it can be to them to re-experience something they thought was dead and gone.

That's the basic reason the species flaw dictates that they can't know their own possibilities in real time. Mostly. That would require not a dual awareness of being in a hypnotic trance and simultaneously ex-is in an awareness of what questions need to be asked in order for them to recall a ti-me (tie-to-me) when the memores they acquired wasn't stored in abstract constructions accessed through woids.

That said, that's exactly what needed to be there and was there for me to experience my remembering vision. Enlightenment of this order is what can happen when and if a dual state of being can be cognated simultaneously.

Specifically, in this case, the facticity of entering a hypnotic state of being, and another state of being that is able to critic the behavior of the other simultaneous state of being. This dual state of duality is needed to fetch a third state of being that contains the first two simultaneous states of being.

The secret of this to me seems to be consistent with a recent realization is that to recognize the two separate realities of being in a hypnotic, receptive state of being simultaneously with another state of being which can objectively observe the behavior of it's doppelganger state of being produces the third state of being extemporaneously.

I hope you're keeping up, because I've already gone further with this than I thought I could. The third state of being can be self-generated to fulfill the role played by the entity of the third state or it can be another homo sapien who consciously interjects themselves as a role player. A hypnotist willing to play God for the other's sake will do quite nicely.

What's in a nayme? What's in a not me? Does playing God for the other do something to the me that stops it from going ho-me again? Playing God for-the-other is about as unselfish as it gets. As most martyrs could attest and often have in their suicide notes they didn't know would turn out to be just that. "I have a dream... I have been to the promised land...".

Martin Luther King, Jr. was such a martyr in my own time. Rosa Parks was not a martyr because she didn't sacrifice her life for the cause. Just like a woman, however, she started that mess that ended well for some, and not for others.
々