❝
Maybe what I'm attempting to write about is the lack of satisfaction gained from studying to learn something I already gnow. I don't always know what I gnow. I gnow what I need to know only when I gnow it. The best way to describe it is to take into consideration the dynamic involved with how the various quotes and sayings that come to mind and mean certain things only upon certain situations specific to the quoted words or sayings.
It's sort of like the History button on my web browser. I don't have to consciously keep up with where I've surfed to previously. The browser is programmed to remember and I don't need to. All I need to remember is that if for some reason or the other I wanna return to a web site I visited earlier, I can activate the History folder and double-click the previous locations into being for any reason that enchants me.
Some homo sapiens can invoke the attributes of all the living beings they were previous to the animal they've made themself into presently. Any and all of the previous incarnations they've made themselves into before. The others that don't do it can't do it because they've never remembered being those other entities.
This can happen very quickly. That's why the digital revolution is making this possible for more humans than ever before. Operating computers can assist a human into realizing that processes that ordinarily take a long time to do by hand can be done in a relatively short period of time digitally.
I was watching a Nova program in which this scientist was working the gene pool mojo that's possible because all the genes have been recorded now. She talked about how to find out what the genetic differences between a human and a chimpanzee could take months to scan and record all the genomes involved to find out just a couple of years ago, but the same work could be done by the supercomputer she worked with in one afternoon.
What I'm trying to explain is that if a person was to get into a bar fight and was outnumbered 10-1 by a room full of oversized goons, this would be a really good time to recall having been a gorilla with all it's primitive strength in order to fight the good fight.
I'm claiming that just about any member of the homo sapiens species could do that. I only claiming that it possible, but in order for a human in a bar fight with a bunch of goons to reclaim the strength it had back when it was a gorilla, and realize consciously thats where it's strength to fight the goons came from, it would have to get the picture that was going on with the same approximate speed of a supercomputer.
For an ordinary human to re-cog-nize it's strength was recalled from when it had previously incarnated as a gorilla for a few million years it would have to "see" that extemporaneous image not as stored abstract constructs but as a gorilla would "see" the need for it to act as if it were being attacked by ten other gorillas, and that would be the basis for even a gorilla to have that kind of strength.
That sort of inspiration doesn't last long. It only "appears" in a form that be recognized by a homo sapiens who has a faster brain than a supercomputer. But, for the normal homo sapiens to look for something it's been taught to ignore, they would have to accept things can happen at that speed first, and only then could they anticipate the possibility that it could happen through them.
I really do have an end in mind as I search for the words and metaphors I need to describe something I came into by stealth. I'm seriously considering buying 8 gigabytes of DRAM to add to the 4 gigabytes this iMac came with. It will hold 16 gigabytes of DRAM.
Having 12 gigabytes of DRAM installed will allow this computer to run about as fast as it's capable of running. I wanna learn to "see" fast enough to anticipate what happens next in order for me to believe what happens at least that fast in the dreamtime. I already know I'm not looking for these events to use words and abstract constructions to invoke behavior that transpired previous to the invention of words by homo sapiens.
This is totally involved with what I'm claiming is a species flaw. The inability of a human being to realize it's own possibles in real time. I suspect this flaw or defect can be undone by refusing to be limited to the beauty of abstract constructs. The experience of gnosis brings this result within reach, but with the example of the digital age, gnosis may not be necessary. That's a good thang. '-)
❞
I do not attempt to tell the God's own truth here because I don't know what the truth is or hardly ever. I try to capture the drifting thoughts that randomly appear in my imagination for reasons I may not understand. I don't know if the content I capture with these words is true or false. The Comments settings are turned off to prevent me from having to defend what amounts to little more than fanciful, sometime crude speculation. Great moments in our lives never return.
