I Googled up "Akashic Records" to see what would show up. I haven't read anything much about the Akashic Records since before I went online in the very early Nineties back in the last millennium. I write "millennium" instead of century to convince myself that we are indeed in a new millennium. Just like other subjects I familiarized myself with through books, it always surprises me how much information is available on the internet that I would have had to travel long distances to go to the library where the information was hoarded.
I've been trying to write about what exactly happened when I received what I call my "remembering vision. I've sorta concluded that this event was a conscious contact with the history of the various events that have happened to the pearl-like entity I arrived on Earth as.
From what I'm reading at the sites the results page provided, my experience is not that unusual. The descriptions various people have used to describe wot happened to them is debatable, but not necessarily moot. While it's true that in some ways I don't have to know where I'm at to be there, it's more likely, in this case, that I can't BE in two places at once or rather, I can't describe both places I'm at simultaneously and make sense.
Some of these sites feature authors who claim to experience the Akashic Records. They call this phenomena other naymes too. Like Cosmic Consciousness with capital letters. I agree with the Rabbi I provided a link for, that the name (nay-me) of God in the Jewish tradition indicates their God is described as having a dual nature. They're monotheistic, but their God is both male and female.
It's easy for me to write this as God's own truth (but, remember my disclaimer) to explore the otherness, but I claim it to be that way because the pearl I am is has an inside and an outside, and it makes a difference about the perspective I take. When I inhabit the inside of the pearl, every thing is the sa-me thang. When I'm in the void of being myself, there is only me, "... only this, and nothing more."
When my perspective of the pearl is that of being on the outside looking in, then all things are possible. The outside is populated with things. It is the cornucopia. My experience of these phenomena is what causes me to find interest in Sartre's assessment of situations. He write of somethingness being blocked from all that IS by nothingness, and yet the nothingness is necessary for consciousness to continue in it's own upsurged state-of-being. Consciousness can't ex-is-t apart from the plenitude without denying it as it's ground of being. Consciousness is on the outside looking in and "thinks" all things are possible.
This can be seen in the light of Sartre's claim that homo sapiens have a flaw, and that flaw is that they can't see their own possibles. The only consciousness possessed by the plenitude IS the goals of it's errant being-for-itself. It can't perceive the for-itself due to the same nothingness that prevents consciousness from realizing it's own possibles in real time. Besides that, the plenitude is described only by saying "It is.", and consciousness is what the plenitude is not. The plenitude lacks nothing, and doesn't understand why it is experiencing the angst of the unseen goals of the ungrounded being-for-itself. Two mountains sitting back to back.
I do not attempt to tell the God's own truth here because I don't know what the truth is or hardly ever. I try to capture the drifting thoughts that randomly appear in my imagination for reasons I may not understand. I don't know if the content I capture with these words is true or false. The Comments settings are turned off to prevent me from having to defend what amounts to little more than fanciful, sometime crude speculation. Great moments in our lives never return.
